
Global Dollar (USDG) Review
Licensed issuers in Singapore and the EU, with KPMG-examined reports
of 10
Global Dollar scores 8.4/10, sixth of ten rated stablecoins, up from 8.0 after its monthly reserve reports gained a named examiner, KPMG, and CUSIP-level detail. Licensed issuers in Singapore and Finland earn a 9 on regulation; custody is weakest, as the reserve banks are unnamed. Marks come from desk research of Paxos's reports and terms.
Score arithmetic
(9 + 9 + 9 + 6 + 9) / 5 = 8.4
Issuers
Paxos Digital Singapore Pte. Ltd. and Paxos Issuance Europe Oy, jointly
Supervisors
MAS (Major Payment Institution); FIN-FSA (e-money institution, MiCA)
Examiner
KPMG LLP, monthly, reasonable assurance; latest report dated 23 Oct 2026
Reserve at 30 Sep 2026
US$3.17bn: US$1.68bn MMFs, US$1.41bn T-bills, US$78.1m cash
Redemption
1:1, verified Paxos customers, no Paxos fee; bank fees deducted
Scores
Each criterion carries equal weight. The overall score is the average of these 5 scores — (9.0 + 9.0 + 9.0 + 6.0 + 9.0) ÷ 5 = 8.4.
Pros
- Regulatory oversight 9: MAS-licensed Singapore issuer and FIN-FSA-supervised EU issuer under MiCA
- Reserve transparency 9: KPMG LLP reasonable-assurance reports, T-bills listed by CUSIP
- Redemption 9: 1:1 for verified Paxos customers with no Paxos mint or redeem fee
- September 2026 reserve exceeded tokens outstanding by 0.11% on 30 September
Cons
- Custody 6: reserve banks named only as 'Bank 1' and 'Bank 2 in Singapore'
- Terms do not describe the USDG reserve as bankruptcy-remote; cash deposits are uninsured
- Singapore issuance rests on a payments licence, not a dedicated MAS stablecoin licence
- Bank fees are passed on and a minimum redemption may equal the wire fee
Global Dollar (USDG) scores 8.4 out of 10 in our stablecoin ratings, up from 8.0, sixth of the ten coins rated. The rise comes from reserve reporting: the monthly reports are now examined by KPMG LLP and list every Treasury bill by CUSIP, which answers the main weakness recorded in the last review. Regulation, with licensed issuers in Singapore and Finland, is one of its four criteria marked 9. Custody is still its weakest, because the banks holding the reserve are identified only as "Bank 1" and "Bank 2". The basis is desk research of Paxos's USDG transparency page, the KPMG-examined report for September 2026 and Paxos's stablecoin terms, rechecked on 1 November 2026.
How USDG scores in stablecoins
The category uses five criteria, each marked 0 to 10 and each worth one fifth of the total, as set out in our ratings methodology.
| Criterion | What the published record shows | Mark |
|---|---|---|
| Reserve transparency | Monthly reasonable-assurance reports by KPMG LLP (Enrome LLP before 27 February 2026); September 2026 lists T-bills by CUSIP, funds by identifier and cash by jurisdiction | 9 |
| Regulatory oversight | Paxos Digital Singapore holds a Major Payment Institution licence from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS); Paxos Issuance Europe Oy is an e-money institution supervised by Finland's FIN-FSA under MiCA | 9 |
| Redemption rights | 1:1 for US dollars for verified Paxos customers, with no Paxos mint or redeem fee; bank fees passed on | 9 |
| Custody & segregation | Reserve in segregated accounts held on behalf of USDG holders, but the banks are not named and the terms do not call the reserve bankruptcy-remote | 6 |
| Backing model clarity | Fiat-reserve, with eligible assets set out in the terms and the actual mix shown by asset type each month | 9 |
The arithmetic is a plain average: (9 + 9 + 9 + 6 + 9) / 5 = 42 / 5 = 8.4. No criterion is weighted more than another and no penalty is applied.
Changes from the previous scoring: reserve transparency rose from 7 to 9 because the reports now name the examining firm, KPMG LLP, and give instrument-level detail. Backing model clarity rose from 8 to 9 because the same reports now show the reserve mix by asset type, which the earlier review found missing. Regulatory oversight fell from 10 to 9 under the category's scale rule of 2 November 2026: 10 is reserved for an issuer chartered as a bank or trust company by a US prudential regulator or holding a dedicated stablecoin-issuer licence, and 9 goes to an issuer supervised under a general payments licence such as a MAS Major Payment Institution licence. The overall score moves from 8.0 to 8.4. The other two marks are unchanged.
Strongest criteria: licensing and the new reserve reports
Regulatory oversight (9)
USDG names both issuers and both supervisors. The September 2026 report states that MAS granted Paxos Digital Singapore a Major Payment Institution licence to issue stablecoins on 1 July 2024, and that Paxos Issuance Europe Oy has held an e-money institution licence from FIN-FSA since 23 November 2022. Paxos's stablecoin terms, last updated 30 June 2026, confirm that the two companies issue USDG jointly. One nuance: the report describes Singapore issuance as run "in consideration of" MAS's upcoming stablecoin framework, so the Singapore side rests on a payments licence and a letter of undertaking to MAS rather than a dedicated stablecoin licence. The EU side falls under MiCA's rules for e-money tokens, including reserve segregation and redemption at par. Under the category's scale, that payments-licence basis earns 9, against the 10 given to issuers that are themselves US-chartered trust companies.
Reserve transparency (9)
KPMG LLP's Singapore office gave a reasonable-assurance opinion, dated 23 October 2026, on two dates: 17 and 30 September 2026. On 30 September the report shows 3,164,996,248 USDG outstanding across seven blockchains against US$3,168,423,407 in reserves: US$1.68 billion in government money market funds, US$1.41 billion in Treasury bills and US$78.1 million in cash, a 0.11% excess. Treasury bills are listed by CUSIP, maturity, cost and fair value, and cash is split between Singapore and Luxembourg accounts. That meets the rubric's tests for frequency, a named firm and instrument-level detail. The one gap holding it below 10 is that the banks are anonymized, which the custody mark also reflects.
Backing model clarity (9)
The terms list what may back USDG for each issuer, and the report shows what actually does, by asset type, every month. A reader can see, for example, that cash fell from US$425 million on 17 September to US$78 million on 30 September as more was moved into Treasury bills.
Weaker criteria: redemption limits and unnamed banks
Redemption rights (9)
Paxos states zero fees to mint or redeem USDG, at 1:1, for customers with a fully verified Paxos account. Its terms add that bank fees Paxos incurs are deducted, that a minimum redemption may be set equal to the customer's wire fee, and that dormant accounts with a balance are charged $2.00 a month after twelve months. Holders without a Paxos account exit through the platforms that list USDG.
Custody and segregation (6)
This is the measured weakness. The report says the reserve is held in segregated, unencumbered accounts "on behalf of USDG token holders", and that Treasury bills sit with a qualified custodian. But it identifies the banks only as "Bank 1 in Singapore" and "Bank 2 in Singapore", records the cash deposits as uninsured, and the terms, unlike Paxos's provisions for its US trust company, do not describe the USDG reserve as bankruptcy-remote. The rubric asks whether custodians are named and whether the assets survive the issuer's insolvency; here neither is shown.
What the score does not cover
- Partner rewards. Global Dollar Network partners can receive up to 100% of reserve returns on USDG held on their platforms. Holders receive nothing from the token itself, and the scheme is not scored.
- Peg history and liquidity. Not criteria in this category.
- Freezing powers. Paxos's terms allow tokens to be frozen; contract controls are outside the rubric.
Our guide on how to assess a stablecoin covers those checks.
USDG vs PayPal USD and USD Coin
PayPal USD (PYUSD) scores 8.8, as do Pax Dollar and Ripple USD, and USD Coin (USDC) scores 9.0. The table compares USDG with the two; Pax Dollar's marks match PYUSD's.
| Criterion | USDG | PYUSD | USDC |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reserve transparency | 9 | 9 | 10 |
| Regulatory oversight | 9 | 10 | 10 |
| Redemption rights | 9 | 9 | 7 |
| Custody & segregation | 6 | 7 | 9 |
| Backing model clarity | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| Overall | 8.4 | 8.8 | 9.0 |
USDG trails PYUSD by 0.4 and USDC by 0.6. Both lead on regulation (10 against 9), USDC also leads on custody and transparency, and USDG and PYUSD share the redemption lead. Against PYUSD, a sister token from the same Paxos group, USDG is a point lower on oversight and a point lower on custody.
Who the score suits
The rating fits readers who want a dollar token with licensed issuers outside the United States and audited, line-by-line reserve reports, and who can redeem through a verified Paxos account. It suits less well anyone who wants to know which banks hold the money. This is an assessment of published documents, not a recommendation to hold USDG.
How it compares

Gemini Dollar (GUSD)
Monthly CPA examinations, including an unannounced business day

USD Coin (USDC)
Most frequent reserve disclosure, with a named fund and custodian

Pax Dollar (USDP)
OCC-supervised issuer with KPMG-examined cash and repo reserves

PayPal USD (PYUSD)
OCC-supervised issuer with free, documented 1:1 redemption

Ripple USD (RLUSD)
NYDFS-chartered issuer with a named bank custodian

First Digital USD (FDUSD)
Monthly reserve reports listing each Treasury bill by CUSIP

Tether (USDT)
Named auditor and stated reserve mix, with published redemption fees

Sky USDS
Open on-chain swap route and live collateral totals

Ethena USDe
Plain disclosure that it is a hedged synthetic dollar, not fiat
Sources
Scored from published primary sources rather than hands-on use. Every figure above comes from one of the pages below, on the date shown. Manufacturers change prices and specifications without notice — if something here no longer matches the source, tell us and we will correct it.
- 1.KPMG LLP / Paxos — USDG Redemption Assets Report, 17 and 30 September 2026 (dated 23 Oct 2026) — checked
- 2.Paxos — USDG transparency (attestation reports) — checked
- 3.Paxos — USD stablecoin terms and conditions (updated 30 Jun 2026) — checked
- 4.Paxos — mint and redeem — checked
- 5.Global Dollar — USDG page (issuers, networks) — checked
- 6.Global Dollar — network home page (partner rewards) — checked
- 7.Coin Currents Daily — stablecoin ratings (criteria definitions) — checked
Frequently asked questions
Why does USDG score 8.4?
It is the plain average of five equal marks: 9 for reserve transparency, 9 for regulatory oversight, 9 for redemption rights, 6 for custody and segregation and 9 for backing model clarity. They sum to 42, and 42 divided by 5 is 8.4.
Why did USDG's score rise from 8.0?
Three marks moved. Reserve transparency rose from 7 to 9 because the monthly reports are now examined by KPMG LLP and list holdings by instrument, and backing model clarity rose from 8 to 9 because those reports now show the reserve mix by asset type. Regulatory oversight fell from 10 to 9 under the category's 2 November 2026 scale rule, because the Singapore issuer relies on a general payments licence rather than a dedicated stablecoin licence. The net change is from 8.0 to 8.4.
What holds USDG back?
Custody and segregation, at 6. The September 2026 report names the reserve banks only as 'Bank 1' and 'Bank 2' in Singapore, the cash is uninsured, and Paxos's terms do not say the USDG reserve is bankruptcy-remote.
Which parts of the score were measured?
All five marks rest on the KPMG-examined report for 17 and 30 September 2026, Paxos's USDG transparency page and its stablecoin terms, checked on 1 November 2026. Nothing was tested by minting or redeeming, and peg history, liquidity and partner rewards are not scored.
How does USDG compare with PYUSD and USDC?
PYUSD scores 8.8, 0.4 above USDG, and USDC 9.0, 0.6 above. Both have the higher mark on regulation, USDC also leads on custody and transparency, and USDG and PYUSD both score 9 on redemption against USDC's 7.
Nothing here is financial advice. Editorial policy · How we score · How we're funded.