
First Digital USD (FDUSD) Review
Monthly reserve reports listing each Treasury bill by CUSIP
of 10
FDUSD scores 6.6/10, seventh of ten rated stablecoins. Monthly attestations by a named firm list every T-bill, and a Hong Kong trust company segregates the reserves, but the BVI issuer has no supervisor and the banks holding the reserves are unnamed. Marks come from desk research of the whitepaper, the June 2026 attestation and regulator records.
Score arithmetic
(8 + 4 + 6 + 7 + 8) / 5 = 6.6
Issuer
FD121 (BVI) Limited, British Virgin Islands, since August 2025
Custodian
First Digital Trust Limited, Hong Kong TCSP no. TC006771 (related party)
Attestor
AOGB CPA Limited, ISAE 3000 limited assurance; latest seen 30 June 2026
Reserves at 30 June 2026
US$351.7m: US$300.2m T-bills, US$15m deposit, US$36.5m cash
HKMA licence
None; FDUSD 'will not be' licensed under the Stablecoins Ordinance
Scores
Each criterion carries equal weight. The overall score is the average of these 5 scores — (8.0 + 4.0 + 6.0 + 7.0 + 8.0) ÷ 5 = 6.6.
Pros
- Reserve transparency 8: monthly ISAE 3000 reports by AOGB CPA Limited, T-bills listed by CUSIP
- Custody 7: a named, licensed Hong Kong trust company keeps reserves in segregated accounts
- Backing model clarity 8: stated as fiat-reserve (T-bills, fixed deposits, cash), no yield
- June 2026 report shows US$351.7m in reserves against 350.1m FDUSD in circulation
Cons
- Regulatory oversight 4: the BVI issuer names no supervisor and rules out a Hong Kong licence
- Reserves sit at unnamed institutions in nine countries, through a related-party custodian
- Redemption 6: account holders only, with an unquantified surcharge; not available in the US
- Attestations are limited assurance, and June 2026 is the latest report we could open
First Digital USD (FDUSD) scores 6.6 out of 10 in our stablecoin ratings, seventh of the ten coins rated. It publishes monthly reserve reports with every Treasury bill listed by CUSIP, and its reserves are held apart from the issuer's own funds by a Hong Kong trust company. The score falls short of the regulated issuers above it because the issuer itself, FD121 (BVI) Limited, names no supervisor and says FDUSD will not be licensed under Hong Kong's stablecoin law, and because the banks actually holding the reserves are not named. The basis is desk research of the FDUSD whitepaper, the issuer's June 2026 attestation report, a First Digital release filed with the SEC and the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) register, rechecked on 1 November 2026. First Digital Labs' own website sits behind a bot check we could not pass, so its transparency page was not read directly.
How FDUSD scores in stablecoins
The category uses five criteria, each marked 0 to 10 and each worth one fifth of the total, as set out in our ratings methodology.
| Criterion | What the published record shows | Mark |
|---|---|---|
| Reserve transparency | Monthly ISAE 3000 limited-assurance reports by AOGB CPA Limited, Hong Kong; the June 2026 report lists each T-bill by CUSIP and supply by chain. The banks holding cash are not named | 8 |
| Regulatory oversight | Issuer FD121 (BVI) Limited names no supervisor; the whitepaper says FDUSD "has not been, and will not be" licensed under Hong Kong's Stablecoins Ordinance. The custodian holds a Hong Kong trust-services (TCSP) licence | 4 |
| Redemption rights | At par for holders with an FD121 Account after due diligence; a surcharge may apply and is not quantified; not available in the US | 6 |
| Custody & segregation | First Digital Trust Limited, a related party, holds reserves in segregated accounts; cash and deposits sit at unnamed institutions in nine countries | 7 |
| Backing model clarity | Stated plainly as fiat-reserve: T-bills, fixed deposits and cash, with no yield to holders | 8 |
The arithmetic is a plain average: (8 + 4 + 6 + 7 + 8) / 5 = 33 / 5 = 6.6. No criterion is weighted more than another and no penalty is applied.
Changes from the previous scoring: regulatory oversight fell from 6 to 4 after the whitepaper confirmed that the issuer moved to the British Virgin Islands in August 2025 and that FDUSD will not be licensed under Hong Kong's stablecoin regime. Custody and segregation fell from 9 to 7 because the June 2026 attestation shows the reserves spread across institutions that are not named, held through a custodian in the same group. The overall score moves from 7.4 to 6.6. The other three marks are unchanged.
Strongest criteria: reserve reports and a plain backing model
Reserve transparency (8)
The attesting firm is now named. AOGB CPA Limited signed the report for 30 June 2026 on 10 July 2026, under the ISAE 3000 (Revised) assurance standard. It shows 350,117,619.46 FDUSD in circulation against US$351,727,981.95 in reserves: about US$300.2 million in eight Treasury bills listed by CUSIP and maturity, a US$15 million fixed deposit and US$36.5 million in custody accounts. Supply is broken down by contract on BNB Chain, Ethereum, Sui, Solana, Arbitrum and TON. Three things keep the mark at 8. The engagement gives limited assurance, which the firm says is "substantially less in scope than an audit". The institutions holding the cash are described only by country. And June 2026 is the latest report we could open, because the issuer's report list sits behind the blocked site.
Backing model clarity (8)
The whitepaper describes FDUSD as a fully reserved, fiat-backed coin that pays holders no interest, and the reserve report matches it. One labeling point holds the mark below the 9 given to the clearest issuers: the June report lists the fixed deposit under a heading for government debt held through reverse repurchase agreements, without saying how the two relate.
Weakest criteria: what changed and why
Regulatory oversight (4)
The whitepaper says FDUSD launched in June 2023 from FD121 Limited in Hong Kong and moved to FD121 (BVI) Limited in August 2025, and the June 2026 attestation is addressed to that BVI company. Neither document names a licence or supervisor for the issuer. Hong Kong's licensing regime for fiat-referenced stablecoin issuers took effect on 1 August 2025; the HKMA register, last revised 23 April 2026, lists only Anchorpoint Financial and HSBC. A First Digital release filed with the SEC on 6 October 2026 says the group holds a Hong Kong TCSP licence and two Canadian money services business registrations, and that a licence application for issuing fiat-referenced tokens is pending in Abu Dhabi Global Market. A pending application does not count. The four points reflect the custodian's licence; Tether, whose supervisor is named only in its own terms, receives 5.
Custody and segregation (7)
First Digital Trust Limited is named, registered under Hong Kong's Trustee Ordinance and licensed as a TCSP (no. TC006771). The whitepaper says reserves are kept in "distinct and segregated accounts" and separate from FD121's operating funds. The June 2026 report adds what the earlier mark did not weigh: the custodian is a related party, and much of the reserve sits in accounts it opened in its own name at institutions in Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, Canada, Luxembourg, the US, the UK, Bahrain and Georgia, plus another Hong Kong trust company in the group, none of them named. The report says each rated institution is graded at least A-2 by S&P Global for short-term credit. The whitepaper's statement that reserves "remain protected" in an FDT bankruptcy is the company's own; we did not see the custody agreement.
Redemption rights (6)
Redemption is documented but conditional: an FD121 Account, completed due diligence, no breach of the terms and no legal restriction. The whitepaper says redemption "may be subject to a redemption surcharge" and elsewhere promises zero-fee minting and redemption "as long as you mint more than you redeem", so a pure redeemer cannot price the exit in advance. No minimum is published.
What the score does not cover
- Peg history. FDUSD fell well below $1 in April 2025 after public allegations against its custodian, which First Digital denied. Peg history is not a criterion, so the episode moves no mark.
- Market depth and exchange concentration. First Digital says Binance remains FDUSD's largest centralized market; liquidity is not scored.
- Contract controls. Freezing powers and upgradeable contracts are outside this rubric.
Our guide on how to assess a stablecoin covers those checks.
FDUSD vs Global Dollar and Tether
Two useful comparisons are Global Dollar (USDG) at 8.4, another dollar coin issued outside the US, and Tether (USDT) at 5.4, whose supervisor is named only in its own terms.
| Criterion | FDUSD | USDG | USDT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Reserve transparency | 8 | 9 | 6 |
| Regulatory oversight | 4 | 9 | 5 |
| Redemption rights | 6 | 9 | 5 |
| Custody & segregation | 7 | 6 | 4 |
| Backing model clarity | 8 | 9 | 7 |
| Overall | 6.6 | 8.4 | 5.4 |
FDUSD scores a point higher than USDG on custody, but USDG leads on every other criterion, by five points on oversight and three on redemption, mainly through named supervisors and plain 1:1 redemption. Against Tether, FDUSD leads on four criteria and trails by a point on oversight.
Who the score suits
The rating helps readers weigh line-by-line reserve reports against an issuer with no supervisor. It suits institutions that can open an FD121 Account better than holders who will only ever sell on an exchange. This is an assessment of published documents, not a recommendation to hold FDUSD.
How it compares

Gemini Dollar (GUSD)
Monthly CPA examinations, including an unannounced business day

USD Coin (USDC)
Most frequent reserve disclosure, with a named fund and custodian

Pax Dollar (USDP)
OCC-supervised issuer with KPMG-examined cash and repo reserves

PayPal USD (PYUSD)
OCC-supervised issuer with free, documented 1:1 redemption

Ripple USD (RLUSD)
NYDFS-chartered issuer with a named bank custodian

Global Dollar (USDG)
Licensed issuers in Singapore and the EU, with KPMG-examined reports

Tether (USDT)
Named auditor and stated reserve mix, with published redemption fees

Sky USDS
Open on-chain swap route and live collateral totals

Ethena USDe
Plain disclosure that it is a hedged synthetic dollar, not fiat
Sources
Scored from published primary sources rather than hands-on use. Every figure above comes from one of the pages below, on the date shown. Manufacturers change prices and specifications without notice — if something here no longer matches the source, tell us and we will correct it.
- 1.AOGB CPA Limited — Attestation report on reserves accounts of FD121 (BVI) Limited, 30 June 2026 (signed 10 July 2026) — checked
- 2.First Digital Labs — FDUSD stablecoin whitepaper (August 2025) — checked
- 3.SEC EDGAR — First Digital business combination release, Exhibit 99.1 (6 Oct 2026) — checked
- 4.HKMA — register of licensed stablecoin issuers (revised 23 Apr 2026) — checked
- 5.HKMA — regulatory regime for stablecoin issuers — checked
- 6.Aave governance — Update on FDUSD uncertainty and Guardian activity (Apr 2025) — checked
- 7.Coin Currents Daily — stablecoin ratings (criteria definitions) — checked
Frequently asked questions
Why does FDUSD score 6.6?
It is the plain average of five equal marks: 8 for reserve transparency, 4 for regulatory oversight, 6 for redemption rights, 7 for custody and segregation and 8 for backing model clarity. They sum to 33, and 33 divided by 5 is 6.6.
Why did the FDUSD score fall from 7.4?
Two marks moved. Regulatory oversight dropped from 6 to 4 because the issuer is now a BVI company with no named supervisor and FDUSD will not be licensed in Hong Kong. Custody dropped from 9 to 7 because the June 2026 attestation shows reserves held at unnamed institutions through a related-party custodian.
Who issues FDUSD now?
FD121 (BVI) Limited. The whitepaper says FDUSD launched from FD121 Limited in Hong Kong in June 2023 and moved to the British Virgin Islands in August 2025, and the June 2026 attestation is addressed to the BVI company.
What was measured, and what was not?
The marks rest on the FDUSD whitepaper, the AOGB CPA attestation for 30 June 2026, a First Digital release filed with the SEC and the HKMA register, checked on 1 November 2026. First Digital Labs' website could not be read, so reports after June 2026 were not checked. Peg history and liquidity are not scored.
How does FDUSD compare with USDG and Tether?
FDUSD at 6.6 sits between Global Dollar (USDG) at 8.4 and Tether (USDT) at 5.4. It edges USDG on custody and leads Tether on four criteria, but USDG's named supervisors and plain redemption put it well ahead overall.
Nothing here is financial advice. Editorial policy · How we score · How we're funded.