Skip to content
Swell Restaking (rswETH) logo

Swell Restaking (rswETH) Review

A 10% reward fee that matches the live contract setting

of 10

Swell's rswETH scores 4.6 in liquid restaking, down from 4.8 after its exit mark was re-scored, the plain average of five equal criteria. Its fee is clear, but the code carries no licence, slashing is not addressed, and the exit estimate is stale. Checked 1 November 2026.

Score arithmetic

(7 + 3 + 6 + 1 + 6) / 5 = 4.6 (was 4.8)

Fee

10% of rewards: 5% treasury + 5% node operators (contract, 1 Nov 2026)

Withdrawal

Up to ~21 days per Swell (2024); EigenLayer delay now ~14 days; buffer ~1 day

Licence

No LICENSE file; contract SPDX header "UNLICENSED"

Audits

Sigma Prime; Gauntlet and Chaos Labs on risk; bug bounty up to $250,000

Access

Terms bar US persons from liquid restaking

Scores

Commission clarity
7.0
Slashing & risk disclosure
3.0
Exit & redemption
6.0
Licence & code openness
1.0
Audit disclosure
6.0

Each criterion carries equal weight. The overall score is the average of these 5 scores — (7.0 + 3.0 + 6.0 + 1.0 + 6.0) ÷ 5 = 4.6.

Pros

  • Commission clarity 7/10: 10% fee on rewards, read on-chain as 5% treasury plus 5% operators
  • Exit 6/10: app redemption, a buffer settling in about a day, and a DEX route all described
  • Sigma Prime assessments are public, with a bug bounty of up to $250,000
  • Fee is taken from rewards, not from deposited ETH

Cons

  • Licence 1/10: no LICENSE file, and the rswETH contract header reads "UNLICENSED"
  • Slashing 3/10: no account of how EigenLayer slashing would reach rswETH holders
  • Exit fell from 7 to 6: the 21-day estimate assumes a 7-day EigenLayer delay, now 14 days
  • Fee split can be changed by an access-control role; contract is upgradeable

This review grades rswETH, Swell's liquid restaking token, in our liquid restaking ratings. ETH deposited with Swell funds validators restaked on EigenLayer, and the token's ETH value rises as rewards accrue. Swell's earlier liquid staking token is rated separately in our Swell swETH review. The score is desk research from Swell's posts, terms, public code and the token contract, checked on 1 November 2026. Two dated facts frame it: Swell says it is "evolving into Faro", and it shut down its Swellchain layer 2 in June 2026, while stating that rswETH on Ethereum is not affected.

How Swell Restaking scores in liquid restaking

Five criteria, each marked 0 to 10, carry equal weight. The overall score is their plain average: (7 + 3 + 6 + 1 + 6) / 5 = 23 / 5 = 4.6.

Change in this update: exit and redemption fell from 7 to 6 because Swell's published withdrawal estimate is now out of date. It assumes a 7-day EigenLayer delay; EigenLayer's contract now sets about 14 days, and Swell has not revised the figure. The overall score moves from 4.8 to 4.6.

CriterionWhat we foundMark
Commission clarityThe launch post sets a 10% fee on rewards. On 1 November 2026 the contract held 5% for the treasury and 5% for node operators. A role holder can change both.7
Slashing & risk disclosureSwell's rswETH pages do not describe how EigenLayer slashing would be handled or passed to holders, and no insurance is described.3
Exit & redemptionTwo routes are documented: app redemption via a claimable NFT, with a 2024 estimate of up to about 21 days and about a day from a buffer, or a sale on a decentralized exchange. The estimate predates EigenLayer's current 14-day delay.6
Licence & code opennessThe public v3-core-public repository has no LICENSE file, and the rswETH contract's SPDX header reads "UNLICENSED".1
Audit disclosureSigma Prime is named as auditor and its assessments sit in the public repository; Gauntlet and Chaos Labs are named for risk; a bug bounty pays up to $250,000.6

Strongest criteria: commission and exit routes

Commission clarity (7)

Swell's launch post of 29 January 2024 set the fee at 10% of rewards after a 30-day zero-fee start. We read the current values from the rswETH contract on 1 November 2026: the treasury share and the node-operator share were each 5%, a combined 10%, so the published rate and the live setting match. The fee comes out of rewards, not deposits. The mark is held at 7 because the split is not published on a current fee page, and holders of an access-control role can change both values; the code only caps their sum at 100%.

Exit & redemption (6)

Swell's withdrawals post (31 July 2024) describes both exits. A redemption request is minted as an NFT and becomes claimable when ETH is released: 9 to 16 days for the validator exit queue and sweep, plus EigenLayer's delay, for up to about 21 days. A buffer can settle requests in about a day but can run dry under demand. The alternative is selling rswETH on a decentralized exchange at the available price.

That 21-day figure is now out of date. Swell counted EigenLayer's delay as 7 days. On 1 November 2026 EigenLayer's DelegationManager contract returned a minimum withdrawal delay of 100,800 blocks, about 14 days at 12-second blocks. A redemption that waits on a validator exit can therefore take longer than Swell's published estimate, and Swell has not updated it. Market exits are also thin: the token contract reported a supply of about 10,644 rswETH on the same date. Both routes are still described, which keeps the mark at 6, in line with other entries whose exit depends on liquidity; the stale estimate is what cost the seventh point.

Weakest criteria: licence and slashing

Licence & code openness (1) is a measured deficiency. The source can be read on GitHub, which keeps the mark above zero, but no licence is granted: the repository has no LICENSE file and the contract header says "UNLICENSED". By default that reserves all rights. The contract also sits behind an upgradeable proxy, so whoever controls the proxy admin can replace its logic.

Slashing & risk disclosure (3) is a gap in what Swell publishes, not in what we checked. Restaking exposes validators to slashing by the services they secure, on top of Ethereum's own penalties, and EigenLayer now allows slashing for operators who opt into services that use it. Swell's rswETH pages do not say which services the stake secures, how a slash would be absorbed, or whether holders share the loss. The product page still says rswETH restakes to "secure Swell L2", a network that stopped taking deposits in May 2026. Our guide to staking returns after costs explains why slashing and exit time belong in any yield comparison.

Audit disclosure (6) sits in the middle. Sigma Prime's assessments of the restaking contracts are public, which is real disclosure, but they come from a single firm.

What the score does not cover

  • The Faro transition. Swell has not said what Faro means for rswETH in the longer term. That is a business-direction question the criteria do not grade.
  • Access. Swell's terms list liquid restaking of ETH, swETH and rswETH as restricted services that US persons may not use. Availability does not enter the score.
  • Yield and token price. Neither is a criterion. On 1 November 2026 the contract rate was about 1.0828 ETH per rswETH.
  • SWELL token. Governance and the Fee Flow auctions, which burn SWELL, are outside this rating.

Swell Restaking vs the closest rated peers

ServiceOverall score
EigenLayer6.6
Symbiotic6.6
Mellow6.0
Kelp DAO (rsETH)5.4
Swell Restaking (rswETH)4.6
Eigenpie (mLRT)3.6

Scores are as published on 1 November 2026. Swell is eighth of nine: Kelp DAO is 0.8 points ahead and Eigenpie 1.0 behind. EigenLayer, the restaking layer rswETH uses, scores 6.6, and Renzo leads at 7.6. The licence mark of 1 is the main drag: the other four marks alone average 5.5.

Who this rating suits

The score is most useful to readers outside the United States who already hold or are weighing rswETH and want to know what Swell publishes on fees and exits. It is a weak fit for anyone who needs open-source code or a clear account of slashing exposure. A 4.6 measures disclosure, not safety, and is not a recommendation; the rules are set out in our methodology.

How it compares

Sources

Scored from published primary sources rather than hands-on use. Every figure above comes from one of the pages below, on the date shown. Manufacturers change prices and specifications without notice — if something here no longer matches the source, tell us and we will correct it.

  1. 1.Swell: Introducing rswETH (29 Jan 2024) — checked
  2. 2.Swell: rswETH withdrawals (31 Jul 2024) — checked
  3. 3.Swell: liquid restaking (rswETH) page — checked
  4. 4.Swell: terms of service — checked
  5. 5.Swell: Sunsetting Swellchain, from L2 to Faro (28 Apr 2026) — checked
  6. 6.Swell: v3-core-public repository — checked
  7. 7.Swell: RswETH.sol (fee parameters, SPDX header) — checked
  8. 8.Etherscan: rswETH token contract — checked
  9. 9.Etherscan: EigenLayer DelegationManager — checked

Frequently asked questions

Why does Swell Restaking score 4.6?

It is the plain average of five equal marks: 7 for commission clarity, 3 for slashing and risk disclosure, 6 for exit and redemption, 1 for licence and code openness and 6 for audit disclosure. They total 23, and 23 divided by five is 4.6.

What holds the score back most?

The licence. Swell's restaking code is public to read but carries no licence: the repository has no LICENSE file and the contract header reads "UNLICENSED". Thin slashing disclosure, at 3, is the second drag.

What changed since the previous score?

Exit and redemption fell from 7 to 6, taking the overall score from 4.8 to 4.6. Swell's 2024 estimate of up to about 21 days counted a 7-day EigenLayer delay; EigenLayer's contract now sets about 14 days, and Swell had not revised the figure by 1 November 2026.

Did the Swellchain shutdown change the score?

No. Swell says rswETH on Ethereum is unaffected by the June 2026 Swellchain shutdown and the move to Faro, and those business changes are not among the five criteria.

How does Swell Restaking compare with Kelp DAO and EigenLayer?

In the same category and under the same criteria, EigenLayer scores 6.6, Kelp DAO 5.4 and Swell Restaking 4.6. Renzo leads at 7.6.

Nothing here is financial advice. Editorial policy · How we score · How we're funded.