
Exodus Review
Broad asset coverage with Ledger and Trezor pairing
of 10
Exodus scores 7.0/10 in our wallet ratings on the strength of very broad asset coverage, Ledger and Trezor pairing and on-device keys. It is held back by a partly closed codebase and swap pricing published only as a "from 0.5%" spread. Based on desk research of Exodus pages and its 2025 SEC annual report.
Overall score
7.0/10 (35 / 5), up from 6.6
Assets
Over 700,000, per the 2025 annual report
Swap pricing
Variable spread; homepage says rates from 0.5%
Source code
Partly open source; some components closed, per Exodus
Hardware wallets
Ledger and Trezor
Custody
Keys encrypted on device; key data not retained by Exodus
Scores
Each criterion carries equal weight. The overall score is the average of these 5 scores — (9.0 + 3.0 + 9.0 + 5.0 + 9.0) ÷ 5 = 7.0.
Pros
- Annual report states support for over 700,000 assets on desktop and mobile (coverage 9)
- Pairs with both Ledger and Trezor hardware wallets (hardware 9)
- SEC filing states private key data is not retained by Exodus (custody 9)
- No Exodus fee on sends; only the network fee applies
Cons
- Only partly open source; interface components are kept closed (open source 3)
- Swap cost is a variable spread with a 0.5% floor and no stated ceiling (fees 5)
- Browser extension support ended on 1 October 2026
- Hardware list is two brands, with no air-gapped QR signers named
Exodus scores 7.0 out of 10 in our wallet ratings, fifth of the six wallets we rate. It does well on asset coverage, hardware pairing and key custody. It loses most of its points on code transparency and on swap pricing, which is published only as a starting rate.
How Exodus scores in wallets
Every wallet in this category is marked on the same five criteria, each from 0 to 10 and each carrying equal weight. The basis is desk research of primary sources: Exodus's own website and knowledge base, and the annual report it filed with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in March 2026. We did not install or test the app for this rating.
| Criterion | Finding | Mark |
|---|---|---|
| Custody & key control | Keys are encrypted on your device; the 2025 annual report says private key data is not retained by Exodus | 9 |
| Open source | Exodus says the wallet is only partly open source; some components, including design and interface elements, are kept closed | 3 |
| Chain & asset coverage | The annual report says users can send, receive and store over 700,000 digital assets on desktop and mobile | 9 |
| Fee transparency | No Exodus fee on sends; swaps carry a variable spread the homepage says starts at 0.5%, with no stated ceiling | 5 |
| Hardware wallet support | Ledger and Trezor devices can be connected | 9 |
The overall score is the plain average: (9 + 3 + 9 + 5 + 9) / 5 = 35 / 5 = 7.0.
Two marks rose at this check, each because a primary source now says something it did not say, or that we had not cited, at the July 2026 check. Custody & key control rose from 8 to 9 after the annual report stated that private key data is not retained by Exodus, which is the same kind of statement that earns MetaMask, Phantom and Trust Wallet a 9. Fee transparency rose from 4 to 5 because the homepage now gives a starting rate for swaps and a support article explains how the spread is set. Open source was first raised from 3 to 4 after Exodus's knowledge base began stating its position (partly open, partly closed), then returned to 3 under the category's scale rule of 2 November 2026, which gives 3 to a proprietary core with only some components open. The overall score moved from 6.6 to 7.0.
Strongest criteria
Chain & asset coverage: 9
The annual report for 2025 describes the wallet as letting users send, receive and store more than 700,000 digital assets, fungible tokens and NFTs among them, on both desktop and mobile. That figure is the company's own count, and it measures how many assets the app lists, not how deep the support is on each network. It is still the second-broadest coverage among the wallets we rate, behind Trust Wallet's 100-plus blockchains.
Hardware wallet support: 9
Exodus connects to both Ledger and Trezor devices, so keys can stay on dedicated hardware while the Exodus interface is used for viewing balances and building transactions. Two major device families earn a 9. The 10 in this category goes to wallets such as Sparrow and Rabby, which list a much wider range of signers, including air-gapped devices that work by QR code. Our hardware wallet ratings cover the devices themselves.
Custody & key control: 9
Exodus is self-custodial. Its knowledge base says keys are encrypted and stored on your device, and its SEC filing says the company does not retain private key data. The trade-off is the usual one: if the 12-word recovery phrase is lost, Exodus cannot restore access.
Weakest criteria
Open source: 3, a measured deficiency
Exodus's answer to "is Exodus open source?" is "partly". Its knowledge base says the wallet is built on many open-source components, but that some parts, including design and interface elements, are kept closed so that phishing copies of the app are harder to build. The annual report lists the open-source licences it uses (MIT, Apache, Mozilla Public License and others). It does not say which parts of the shipped app can be read. The result is that nobody outside the company can check the released app against public source. That is a deficiency, not a gap in our research. Under the category's scale, a proprietary core with only some components open scores 3, the same mark MetaMask receives for its non-commercial licence. It sits two points below Trust Wallet's 5, because Trust Wallet names a specific core library, Wallet Core, and its Apache 2.0 licence, while Exodus does not say which of its components are public.
Fee transparency: 5, partly disclosed
Sending crypto costs only the network fee; Exodus says it keeps none of it. Swaps are different. They run through third-party providers, and the cost is a spread built into the rate rather than a stated fee. The homepage says swap rates start at 0.5%. Exodus's support article on spreads says the spread changes with liquidity and widens in volatile markets or for thinly traded assets, and that the app shows the exact amounts before you confirm. A floor without a ceiling tells you the lowest possible cost, not what a given swap will cost. MetaMask, Phantom and Rabby each publish a fixed percentage and score 10. The way to compare is to read the preview: if $1,000 of one asset would return $985 of another, the swap costs about 1.5% all-in. Our guide to where exchange fees hide explains how to price a spread.
What the score does not cover
- The browser extension. Exodus ended support for its Web3 Wallet extension on 1 October 2026. It no longer sends or shows balances. No criterion measures platform range, so the score did not move, but the change matters if you connect to decentralized apps from a desktop browser.
- Exodus Pay and the card. The payments account and virtual card bring in identity checks and third-party issuers. They are outside this rubric.
- The swap providers themselves. The annual report says that once a provider is selected, Exodus has no further involvement in the transaction. We did not assess the providers.
- Security testing. We did not audit the code, and a high mark is not a safety guarantee.
Exodus vs Phantom and Trust Wallet
Among the six wallets we rate, the standings are Rabby Wallet 9.0, Sparrow Wallet 8.8, MetaMask 7.8, Phantom 7.4, Exodus 7.0 and Trust Wallet 6.4. Exodus's closest neighbors are Phantom at 7.4 and Trust Wallet at 6.4. Exodus outscores Phantom on coverage (9 against 7) and hardware support (9 against 8), but Phantom publishes an exact 0.85% swap fee (10 against 5). Phantom is ahead overall by 0.4. Against Trust Wallet, 0.6 behind, Exodus trails on coverage (9 against 10) and open source (3 against 5) but leads on fee disclosure and, by a wide margin, on hardware support (9 against 4).
Who it suits
The score favors someone who wants one desktop and mobile app for many assets, with the option of keeping keys on a Ledger or Trezor. It is a weaker fit if you need to read the app's source code or know in advance exactly what a swap will cost. On those two points the wallets above it in the ratings disclose more. Download only from exodus.com or the official app stores, because cloned wallet apps are a common route to theft; see our guide to avoiding wallet scams.
How it compares

Rabby Wallet
Open-source EVM wallet with a low published fee and wide hardware list

Sparrow Wallet
Open-source Bitcoin wallet for hardware signing and your own node

MetaMask
Published swap fee and wide hardware wallet support

Phantom
Clear custody terms and a published swap fee for Solana users

Trust Wallet
Broadest chain coverage in one self-custodial app
Sources
Scored from published primary sources rather than hands-on use. Every figure above comes from one of the pages below, on the date shown. Manufacturers change prices and specifications without notice — if something here no longer matches the source, tell us and we will correct it.
- 1.Exodus Movement, Inc. — Form 10-K for fiscal 2025 (SEC): assets, key custody, open-source licences, swap providers — checked
- 2.Exodus — homepage (swap rates from 0.5%, hardware wallets, platforms) — checked
- 3.Exodus Knowledge Base — Is Exodus open source? (updated 22 Sep 2026) — checked
- 4.Exodus Knowledge Base — What is a spread when swapping crypto? — checked
- 5.Exodus Knowledge Base — Does Exodus have transaction fees to send or receive? (updated 16 Oct 2026) — checked
- 6.Exodus Knowledge Base — Support for Exodus Web3 Wallet has ended (updated 8 Oct 2026) — checked
Frequently asked questions
Why does Exodus score 7.0?
It is the plain average of five equally weighted marks: 9 for custody, 3 for open source, 9 for asset coverage, 5 for fee transparency and 9 for hardware support. The total of 35 divided by 5 gives 7.0.
What holds the Exodus score back?
Two things. Parts of the app are deliberately closed source, so the released code cannot be checked in full. And swap cost is a spread with a published floor of 0.5% but no fixed rate, so you only see the real cost in the preview before confirming.
What changed since the previous Exodus rating?
Two marks rose on 1 November 2026: custody from 8 to 9 and fee transparency from 4 to 5, each after a new or newly cited Exodus source. Open source rose from 3 to 4, then returned to 3 under the category's 2 November 2026 scale rule for a proprietary core with only some components open. The overall score moved from 6.6 to 7.0.
Was Exodus tested hands-on for this rating?
No. The marks come from desk research of Exodus's own pages and its SEC filings. We did not install the app or audit its code, and the score does not cover Exodus Pay or the third-party swap providers.
How does Exodus compare with Phantom and Trust Wallet?
Phantom scores 7.4, mainly because it publishes a fixed 0.85% swap fee, though Exodus covers more assets and more hardware. Trust Wallet scores 6.4. It covers more chains but does not state hardware wallet support on the pages we opened and is inconsistent about its swap fee.
Nothing here is financial advice. Editorial policy · How we score · How we're funded.