Skip to content

Ranked & Reviewed · 10 services

Best Liquid Staking Protocols

Ten liquid staking tokens for ETH and SOL, ranked on fee disclosure, exit terms, operator decentralisation, code licence and audits. Marks checked on 1 November 2026 against primary sources.

At a glance

Best Liquid Staking Protocols: rank, score and best use per service
#ServiceScoreBest for
1Stader (ETHx) logoStader (ETHx)8.8A published fee split and a permissionless operator pool
2Jito (JitoSOL) logoJito (JitoSOL)8.6Priced instant and delayed exits, with stake spread by published rules
3Mantle (mETH) logoMantle (mETH)8.2MIT-licensed code, 16 listed audits and a fee-free redemption queue
4Puffer (pufETH) logoPuffer (pufETH)7.8Permissionless bonded operators and a priced instant exit
5Origin Ether (OETH) logoOrigin Ether (OETH)7.6MIT-licensed code, mapped audits and a fee-free 1:1 withdrawal
6Bedrock (uniETH) logoBedrock (uniETH)6.6Open-licensed contract code with a stated 10% reward fee
7Liquid Collective (LsETH) logoLiquid Collective (LsETH)6.6Named operators and a ten-report audit record, with KYC access
8Frax Ether (sfrxETH) logoFrax Ether (sfrxETH)6.2A fully itemized fee split, with 2% set aside for an insurance fund
9Ankr (ankrETH) logoAnkr (ankrETH)5.8A priced instant exit: flash unstake for a stated 0.5%
10Swell (swETH) logoSwell (swETH)4.4Eight named operators on distributed validators; deposits now paused

Best Liquid Staking Protocols, ranked by score

Rank 1Stader (ETHx) logo
Top score

Stader (ETHx)

A published fee split and a permissionless operator pool

Stader (ETHx) scores 8.8 out of 10 in liquid staking, the top mark on 1 November 2026, unchanged after a re-check. A published 5% and 5% fee split, a permissionless operator pool, GPL-3.0 code and seven linked audits lead; the 7 to 10 day exit with no instant route is the weakest mark.

Commission clarity
9.0
Exit & redemption
7.0
Operator decentralisation
9.0
Licence & code openness
10.0
Audit disclosure
9.0

Pros

  • Commission clarity 9: 10% of rewards, split 5% protocol and 5% node operator commission
  • Operator decentralisation 9: permissionless pool open to anyone with 4 ETH plus SD collateral
  • Licence & code openness 10: GPL-3.0 on the maintained stader-labs/ethx repository
  • Audit disclosure 9: seven linked reports from Halborn, Sigma Prime and Code4rena

Cons

  • Exit & redemption 7: typically 7 to 10 days, with no instant route in the protocol
  • Payout uses the lower of the request and finalization rates, and rewards stop on request
  • The audit page gives no dates for its seven reports
  • Share of stake in the permissionless versus whitelisted pool is not published
Rank 2Jito (JitoSOL) logo

Jito (JitoSOL)

Priced instant and delayed exits, with stake spread by published rules

Jito (JitoSOL) scores 8.6 out of 10 in liquid staking, up from 7.8 now that its docs are confirmed to name the stake pool's three auditors. The fee, both exits and the delegation rules are published. StakeNet's own audits leave the firm unnamed. Based on primary sources checked on 1 November 2026.

Commission clarity
9.0
Exit & redemption
9.0
Operator decentralisation
8.0
Licence & code openness
9.0
Audit disclosure
8.0

Pros

  • Commission clarity 9: 4% of rewards after validator commission, about 0.3% of deposits a year
  • Exit & redemption 9: instant Jupiter swap or direct unstake for 0.1% within about 2 days
  • Operator decentralisation 8: top 400 validators by published rules, superminority excluded
  • Licence & code openness 9: StakeNet, Jito-Solana and the SPL stake pool are Apache-2.0
  • Audit disclosure 8: Quantstamp, Neodyme and Kudelski named with reports and commit hashes

Cons

  • The named audits cover the generic SPL stake pool, not Jito's own StakeNet or Interceptor
  • StakeNet's two audit reports (January and July 2024) do not name the auditor
  • The jito-programs repository, which holds tip distribution, has no licence file
  • Delegation is capped at 400 validators and requires the Jito MEV client
Rank 3Mantle (mETH) logo

Mantle (mETH)

MIT-licensed code, 16 listed audits and a fee-free redemption queue

Mantle mETH scores 8.2 out of 10 in liquid staking, up from 6.6 after its contracts repository was found to carry an MIT licence. Sixteen listed audits and a fee-free queue support the score; five permissioned operators are the weakest mark. Based on primary sources checked on 1 November 2026.

Commission clarity
8.0
Exit & redemption
8.0
Operator decentralisation
6.0
Licence & code openness
10.0
Audit disclosure
9.0

Pros

  • Licence & code openness 10: MIT License in the mantle-lsp/contracts repository
  • Audit disclosure 9: 16 reviews from eight named firms, 2023 to November 2025
  • Exit & redemption 8: no withdrawal fee, minimum wait about 12 hours, buffer pays at once
  • Commission clarity 8: about 10% of mETH rewards and 20% on cmETH stated in the overview

Cons

  • Operator decentralisation 6: five named, permissioned operators with no open entry
  • Worst-case redemption stated as 40+ days when the Liquidity Buffer runs short
  • Fee given as "approximately" 10%, with no split, plus a 4 bps deposit adjustment
  • Liquidity Buffer is labelled capped production testing and lends ETH on Aave
Rank 4Puffer (pufETH) logo

Puffer (pufETH)

Permissionless bonded operators and a priced instant exit

Puffer (pufETH) scores 7.8 out of 10 in liquid staking, up from 6.6 after its repository's six-firm audit list was counted. Open operator entry, GPL-3.0 code and two priced exits lead the score; the unpublished protocol fee holds it back. Based on primary sources checked on 1 November 2026.

Commission clarity
3.0
Exit & redemption
9.0
Operator decentralisation
9.0
Licence & code openness
10.0
Audit disclosure
8.0

Pros

  • Operator decentralisation 9: permissionless entry with a 2 ETH bond and 28 validator tickets
  • Exit & redemption 9: instant to WETH for 1%, or no fee in around 14 days
  • Licence & code openness 10: GPL-3.0 on the pufETH repository
  • Audit disclosure 8: six named firms plus an Immunefi Boost, reports linked in the README

Cons

  • Commission clarity 3: a protocol fee exists but no percentage is published
  • Audit list lives only in a repository README; no report is dated after April 2024
  • Withdrawals pay WETH, and instant capacity depends on unpublished vault liquidity
  • Restaking through EigenLayer adds slashing exposure the five criteria do not score
Rank 5Origin Ether (OETH) logo

Origin Ether (OETH)

MIT-licensed code, mapped audits and a fee-free 1:1 withdrawal

Origin Ether (OETH) scores 7.6 out of 10 in liquid staking, down from 8.4, because its validators now run on a single named provider, MAVAN. Open code, linked audits and a fee-free 1:1 withdrawal keep it in the upper half. Based on primary sources checked on 1 November 2026.

Commission clarity
8.0
Exit & redemption
8.0
Operator decentralisation
3.0
Licence & code openness
10.0
Audit disclosure
9.0

Pros

  • Licence & code openness 10: MIT License on the active origin-dollar repository
  • Audit disclosure 9: linked reports mapped to each component, May 2023 to June 2026
  • Exit & redemption 8: 1:1 withdrawal with no fee, up to about 8 days, or instant on Curve
  • Commission clarity 8: 20% performance fee stated, with net fees directed to OGN buybacks

Cons

  • Operator decentralisation 3: validators run on one named provider, MAVAN, with no other operator
  • The 20% performance fee is the highest stated rate among the peers compared here
  • No split of the fee between protocol and operator is published
  • Smart-contract holders earn nothing unless they opt in to rebases
Rank 6Bedrock (uniETH) logo

Bedrock (uniETH)

Open-licensed contract code with a stated 10% reward fee

Bedrock (uniETH) scores 6.6 out of 10 in liquid staking, up from 5.0 now that its docs link a GPL-3.0 contract repository. The fee is stated. Native exits come only in 32 ETH units, and the validator operators are not named. Based on primary sources checked on 1 November 2026.

Commission clarity
8.0
Exit & redemption
6.0
Operator decentralisation
2.0
Licence & code openness
10.0
Audit disclosure
7.0

Pros

  • Licence & code openness 10: docs link a GPL-3.0 contract repository with mainnet addresses
  • Commission clarity 8: 10% on block rewards, transaction fees and MEV; 0% on EigenLayer points
  • Audit disclosure 7: PeckShield's 15 February 2024 uniETH report is named and linked
  • Exit terms are stated: 2 to 10 days plus 7 days for EigenLayer, with no withdrawal fee listed

Cons

  • Operator decentralisation 2: no operator named, no validator count, no permission model
  • Exit & redemption 6: native redemption only in 32 ETH multiples; smaller amounts swap at market
  • Restaking-fee commission is not yet set; Bedrock says the community will decide it
  • No uniETH audit listed after February 2024; later audits cover Bitcoin products
Rank 7Liquid Collective (LsETH) logo

Liquid Collective (LsETH)

Named operators and a ten-report audit record, with KYC access

Liquid Collective (LsETH) scores 6.6 out of 10 in liquid staking, up from 4.8, after its audit page and named operator list were re-checked. Ten linked audits and six named operators lift it; the Business Source licence and a queue-only exit hold it back. Based on primary sources checked on 1 November 2026.

Commission clarity
8.0
Exit & redemption
6.0
Operator decentralisation
6.0
Licence & code openness
4.0
Audit disclosure
9.0

Pros

  • Audit disclosure 9: ten linked reports, Jul 2022 to Mar 2026, from Halborn, Spearbit, Quantstamp, Certora
  • Commission clarity 8: fee stated as 10% of network rewards, taken by minting LsETH
  • Operator decentralisation 6: six named operators, including Coinbase, Figment and Blockdaemon
  • Redemption stages, queue order and daily oracle cycle are documented

Cons

  • Licence & code openness 4: Business Source License 1.1 until 19 Aug 2028 at the latest
  • Exit & redemption 6: no instant exit, no cancellation; large requests wait on validator exits
  • The 10% fee's split among six groups, including the coverage treasury, is not published
  • Operators are a curated set admitted by approval, not open entry
Rank 8Frax Ether (sfrxETH) logo

Frax Ether (sfrxETH)

A fully itemized fee split, with 2% set aside for an insurance fund

Frax Ether (sfrxETH) scores 6.2 out of 10 in liquid staking, up from 4.4. It publishes its fee split, a fee-free redemption queue and four linked audits. The validators are Frax's own, and the repositories carry licence headers but no licence file. Based on primary sources checked on 1 November 2026.

Commission clarity
9.0
Exit & redemption
6.0
Operator decentralisation
3.0
Licence & code openness
5.0
Audit disclosure
8.0

Pros

  • Commission clarity 9: 10% of income kept, split 8% protocol and 2% insurance fund; 90% to holders
  • Audit disclosure 8: four linked reports from Code4rena, Trail of Bits and Frax Security Cartel
  • Exit & redemption 6: queue redeems frxETH 1:1 for ETH with no fee or slippage
  • Each Frax-run validator's public address is published

Cons

  • Operator decentralisation 3: validators run in-house; V2 external pools have no stated live status
  • Licence & code openness 5: no LICENSE file in the three repositories, only per-file headers
  • The redemption wait adds Ethereum's entry and exit queues, with no typical duration stated
  • No protocol instant exit; a fast exit means selling at market price on a DEX
Rank 9Ankr (ankrETH) logo

Ankr (ankrETH)

A priced instant exit: flash unstake for a stated 0.5%

Ankr (ankrETH) scores 5.8 out of 10 in liquid staking, carried by a published 10% reward fee and a flash unstake priced at 0.5%. Ankr runs every validator itself and its contract code carries no licence. Based on primary sources checked on 1 November 2026.

Commission clarity
8.0
Exit & redemption
9.0
Operator decentralisation
3.0
Licence & code openness
2.0
Audit disclosure
7.0

Pros

  • Exit & redemption 9: flash unstake is instant for a stated 0.5%, with the standard route alongside
  • Commission clarity 8: the fee is published as one figure, 10% of staking rewards
  • Audit disclosure 7: three reports linked with firms and dates (Beosin 2020 and 2022, Salus 2023)
  • The unstaking guide states the 0.5 ETH minimum and what happens when the flash pool is full

Cons

  • Operator decentralisation 3: Ankr runs all of its roughly 1,700 validators, with no outside operators
  • Licence & code openness 2: no contract repository found; verified implementation declares no licence
  • Audit disclosure: no ETH staking audit listed after May 2023
  • Flash-unstake capacity depends on the pool and no size is published
Rank 10Swell (swETH) logo

Swell (swETH)

Eight named operators on distributed validators; deposits now paused

Swell (swETH) scores 4.4 out of 10 in liquid staking, up from 2.8, and remains last. Deposits were paused on 1 November 2026 after an unexplained rate jump on 22 October; withdrawals were open. Fees, exit terms and audits had to be read from contracts and code because Swell's documentation could not be reached.

Commission clarity
5.0
Exit & redemption
4.0
Operator decentralisation
6.0
Licence & code openness
2.0
Audit disclosure
5.0

Pros

  • Operator decentralisation 6: eight named operators running on SSV distributed validators
  • Commission clarity 5: contract shows 5% to treasury and 5% to node operators
  • Audit disclosure 5: Sigma Prime and Cyfrin reports published in the code repository
  • Withdrawals reopened by 1 November 2026 after the October pause

Cons

  • Deposits paused on 1 Nov 2026; Swell has published no cause for the 22 Oct rate jump
  • Exit & redemption 4: withdrawals were paused 23 to 31 Oct and no expected wait is published
  • Licence & code openness 2: no licence file and "UNLICENSED" source headers
  • Fee and audit scope are not stated on any Swell page we could read

Best liquid staking tokens by use case

  • You want to know exactly where the fee goes and can wait about a week to exit: Stader ETHx. It publishes a 5% protocol and 5% operator split (commission clarity 9) and runs a permissionless operator pool alongside a whitelisted one (operator decentralisation 9). Unstaking typically takes 7 to 10 days, with no instant route (exit 7).
  • You stake SOL and want a priced choice between a fast and a slow exit: Jito JitoSOL, the only Solana entry. An instant swap through Jupiter, with slippage Jito puts typically under 0.3%, or a direct unstake for 0.1% that waits up to one epoch, about two days (exit 9).
  • You want open operator entry on Ethereum and a priced instant exit: Puffer pufETH. Anyone can run a validator with a 2 ETH bond (operators 9), and withdrawals are instant for 1% or free in around 14 days (exit 9). The protocol fee percentage is not published (commission 3), and pufETH is also restaked through EigenLayer.
  • You want the longest audit list and a fee-free redemption queue: Mantle mETH, with 16 listed audits from eight firms (audit 9) and no withdrawal fee (exit 8). Its terms exclude US persons, and five permissioned firms run its validators (operators 6).
  • You want part of the fee set aside for losses: Frax Ether, whose FIP-122 split sends 8% of staking income to the protocol and 2% to an insurance fund (commission 9). Validators are run by Frax alone (operators 3).
  • You stake through a platform with KYC checks: Liquid Collective LsETH, with six named operators and ten linked audits (audit 9). Minting and redeeming are limited to allowlisted wallets.

Swell swETH is not listed for any use case. Its deposits were paused on 1 November 2026 after an unexplained jump in the swETH-to-ETH rate on 22 October; withdrawals were open that day.

How the ranking works

Every token is marked 0 to 10 on five criteria from the published liquid staking rubric. Each counts for 20%:

  • Commission clarity: a fee stated as a figure scores well; a published split between protocol, operators and any insurance fund scores best.
  • Exit & redemption: a stated unbonding queue and fee beat vague withdrawal language; a priced instant route alongside a fee-free standard route scores highest.
  • Operator decentralisation: permissionless entry scores highest, a named permissioned set scores mid-scale, and a single operator or an unnamed one scores low.
  • Licence & code openness: read from the licence file in the contract repository. A recognised open-source licence scores 10; a missing licence file scores lowest, because published code with no grant reserves every right.
  • Audit disclosure: reports published with the firms named. A claim of audits by unnamed firms is not disclosure.

The overall score is the plain average of the five marks, rounded to one decimal. Stader's marks of 9, 7, 9, 10 and 9 total 44, and 44 divided by 5 is 8.8. Ties are listed alphabetically, which is why Bedrock appears above Liquid Collective at 6.6. Every mark was checked against primary sources on 1 November 2026: documentation, GitHub repositories and, where documentation was unreachable, the contracts on Ethereum. The basis is desk research, not test deposits or withdrawals. Marks are re-checked on each update, and each review logs what changed and why. The full method is on our ratings methodology page.

What changed in this update

Eight of the ten scores moved in the November 2026 re-check, and the order changed. Most rises correct findings the July check missed, such as a licence file or an audit list that already existed. Origin's fall reflects a change in its own documentation.

TokenNowJuly 2026What moved
Stader (ETHx)8.88.8No change; same fee, exit, operators, licence and audits
Jito (JitoSOL)8.67.8Audit 4 to 8: the deployed programs page names Quantstamp, Neodyme and Kudelski
Mantle (mETH)8.26.6Licence 2 to 10: an MIT licence in a file spelled LICENCE
Puffer (pufETH)7.86.6Audit 3 to 8 (six firms in the repository README); exit 8 to 9
Origin Ether (OETH)7.68.4Operators 7 to 3: validators now run on one named provider, MAVAN
Bedrock (uniETH)6.65.0Licence 2 to 10: docs now link a GPL-3.0 repository
Liquid Collective (LsETH)6.64.8Audit 3 to 9, operators 4 to 6, commission 7 to 8
Frax Ether (sfrxETH)6.24.4Audit 2 to 8, exit 4 to 6, operators 2 to 3
Ankr (ankrETH)5.85.8No change
Swell (swETH)4.42.8Commission 2 to 5, exit 2 to 4, audit 2 to 5, read from contracts and code

Origin Ether drops from second to fifth. Its July marks credited two SSV distributed-validator clusters; its documentation now names MAVAN as the provider that operates the validator infrastructure, which the rubric scores as a single operator. Two marks rose for consistency rather than new evidence: Puffer's exit now matches Ankr's 9 for the same priced-instant plus fee-free pattern, and Liquid Collective's commission matches the 8 given to other unsplit 10% fees. Swell stays last. Its documentation site refused our requests, so its fee, queue and audit marks come from the swETH contract and Swell's public code, and both deposits and withdrawals were paused from 23 to 31 October. No service was withdrawn from the ranking.

What the scores do not cover

  • Yield and market price. No criterion marks the reward rate, and the secondary-market price of each token was not measured. A token can trade below its redemption value when liquidity is thin.
  • Upgrade control. Governance is not scored. Mantle's contracts upgrade through a timelock whose default delay is zero; Puffer's community multisig can bypass its 7-day timelock.
  • Slashing and loss cover. Origin describes no insurance. Liquid Collective describes three layers of slashing coverage but publishes neither the caps nor the treasury balance. Stader and Swell pay redemptions at the lower of two rates, so a penalty during the wait reduces the payout.
  • Restaking exposure. pufETH and uniETH are restaked through EigenLayer, which adds slashing conditions this rubric does not score. Those designs are compared in the liquid restaking ranking.
  • Access. Mantle, Bedrock and Swell exclude US persons in their terms, and LsETH requires an allowlisted, KYC-checked wallet.
  • Incidents. Ankr's BNB staking token was exploited in December 2022 and Bedrock's uniBTC vault in September 2024. Neither account says the ETH tokens ranked here were affected, and incident history is not a criterion.
  • Other protocols. Using a receipt token as collateral adds that protocol's risk. Drift's April 2026 incident update lists about 33,977 jitoSOL among the stolen funds.

How to choose a liquid staking token

  1. Find the fee as a percentage of rewards. Rates in this ranking run from Jito's 4% to Origin's 20% performance fee, and Puffer publishes none.
  2. Read the exit terms: the queue length, whether rewards stop on request, which exchange rate applies, and the price of any instant route.
  3. Check who runs the validators and whether others can join.
  4. Check the terms of use for your country and any KYC requirement before you deposit.
  5. Open the latest audit and note its date and scope. Several lists stop in 2023 or 2024.
  6. Check the protocol's status page or official channels for pauses before minting or redeeming.
  7. Work out what reaches you after commission, slashing and exit costs; our guide to staking returns after costs shows the arithmetic.

What is liquid staking?

Liquid staking deposits your ETH or SOL with a protocol that stakes it and gives you a receipt token. The token keeps earning staking rewards while you can still hold, sell or use it elsewhere. Some receipts are value-accruing: the quantity stays fixed and each token becomes redeemable for more of the underlying, as with ETHx and JitoSOL. Others rebase: the balance grows while each token aims to stay worth about one unit, as with OETH, whose wOETH wrapper holds a fixed quantity instead. The receipt is backed by the staked assets, but its market price can still drift, so the native redemption route is the backstop that matters.

Is a liquid staking token the same as staking directly?

No. Direct staking leaves you exposed to the network's validator rules and exit queue. A liquid staking token adds the protocol's smart contracts, its operator choices, its fee and its upgrade controls on top. In return you get a transferable token and, with some protocols, a faster exit than the network's own queue. The five criteria above are the disclosures that let you weigh that trade.

How we score this category

Liquid staking is scored on the yield that reaches you after commission and on whether you can actually get your capital back out. This rubric follows the published commission, the exit terms, the operator set and the code licence — the facts a holder needs before minting a receipt token, and the ones a protocol either documents or leaves vague.

Every service in this ranking is scored 0–10 against the same 5 criteria, each carrying equal weight (20% apiece). The overall score is their plain average, rounded to one decimal place, and each review prints the individual numbers and the arithmetic so you can reproduce the result yourself.

What each criterion covers

Commission clarity20% of the score
Whether the fee taken from staking rewards is published as a figure, and whether the split between protocol, operators and any insurance fund is broken out. A stated percentage beats an APY quoted with no mention of the cut behind it.
Exit & redemption20% of the score
The unbonding period, whether an instant-exit route exists and what it costs, and whether native redemption is available. Vague withdrawal language scores below a stated queue and a stated fee.
Operator decentralisation20% of the score
How many node operators there are and whether entry is permissionless or a curated set. A named permissioned set is scored honestly as such — not disqualified, but distinguished from open participation.
Licence & code openness20% of the score
The licence on the protocol's own contract repository, read from the file. A recognised open-source licence scores highest; a missing licence file scores lowest, since published code with no grant reserves every right.
Audit disclosure20% of the score
Whether audit reports are published with the firms named. A statement that the contracts were audited by top firms, without naming them, is not disclosure.

What does not affect a score

Only the criteria above count. No provider can buy a score, a rank, or an entry in this list. Where two services finish level, they are listed alphabetically rather than ordered silently.

The process across all categories, including how often we re-check, is set out in our ratings methodology.

Frequently asked questions

How were the liquid staking protocols in this ranking selected?

The page ranks the ten liquid staking tokens that have a full review in this category: nine on Ethereum and one, JitoSOL, on Solana. Each issues a receipt token for staked assets with a native redemption route. Restaking tokens are ranked separately in liquid restaking, and multi-service providers such as Lido, Rocket Pool and StakeWise in staking platforms.

How is the overall liquid staking score calculated?

Each token gets a 0 to 10 mark on commission clarity, exit and redemption, operator decentralisation, licence and code openness, and audit disclosure. The overall score is the plain average of the five, rounded to one decimal. Ties are listed alphabetically, not by judgment.

Which risks does the liquid staking score not capture?

Smart-contract failure, slashing losses, upgrade control and the token's market price are not scored. A high mark means the protocol discloses its fee, exit, operators, licence and audits well. It does not mean the token cannot lose value.

What fees and country restrictions should I check before minting?

Fees in this ranking range from 4% of rewards at Jito to a 20% performance fee at Origin, and Puffer publishes no percentage. Mantle, Bedrock and Swell exclude US persons in their terms, and Liquid Collective requires an allowlisted, KYC-checked wallet. Check gas and any instant-exit fee too.

Which liquid staking option fits a SOL holder?

JitoSOL is the only Solana token in this ranking, at 8.6. It charges 4% of staking and MEV rewards and offers both an instant swap and a direct unstake for 0.1%. Other Solana staking services, such as Marinade, are rated in the staking platforms ranking.

How old are the measurements in this ranking?

All marks were checked against primary sources on 1 November 2026, and this page was last reviewed on 6 November 2026. Fees, operator sets and pause status can change between checks, so confirm them on the protocol's own pages before you deposit.

Rankings are editorial. Nothing here is financial advice. Editorial policy · How we score · How we're funded.